Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided via the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking during the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

The main focus is around the intention to cause injury. This is actually a major issue: an especially very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

Life imprisonment is surely an alternative towards the death penalty. In these cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life guiding bars.

competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided via the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Dr.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.

Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment about the offender, guaranteeing they are held accountable for their actions.

Upholding Justice: The application with the law as well as the subsequent punishment with the guilty party give a feeling of closure and justice for the sufferer’s family and loved kinds.

Typically, only an appeal accepted through the court of previous resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For numerous reasons, these appeals in many cases are not granted.

Please note, For anyone who is seeking a cost exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly. 

Alternative Punishment: In some cases, the court might have the discretion to award life imprisonment as an alternative to the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life powering bars without the possibility of parole or early release.

[3] For example, in England, the High Court as well as the Court of Appeals are Each and every bound by their possess previous decisions, however, For the reason that Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Though in practice it seldom does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent may be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court on the United Kingdom ruled that it as well as the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the law for practically 30 years.

However, it’s essential to note that the application of your death penalty is matter to several legal safeguards and because of process to guarantee fair trials.

dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant defeating the ends of justice case law in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )